...
Most common is to set the standard cost for the overhead item based on the # of BBLs. So let's say amount produced (e.g. number of barrels). In this case, brewing a 100 BBL batch should accrue $500 in labor. You would setup the Overhead Brew Labor item with a standard cost of $5, then add it to the BOM with a QTY quantity of 1 . That means that if unit per barrel produced, or $500 per 100 barrels produced. If you end up brewing more or less beer, your labor is adjusted proportionately (iei.e. if you knock out 105 BBLs, you will have $525 in labor).
Then you have your Since labor costs for cellar and packaging labor. You would be different than that for brewing, you can set those at a different per BBL rate, because the labor cost per BBL is different. But you'd still probably . Using the example above, you would still associate it with the BBls of beer, amount produced so that if you filter/package more beer, you accrue more costs (more work = more labor). You can also . On your packaging BOM, for instance, you might add $7 per barrel packaged or $700 per 100 barrels packaged.
If you would like to add even further complexity, you can have packaging line specific labor (iei.e. bottling labor vs kegging labor), which is common if you have totally different costs per BBL on those different packaging lines.
...
These items are setup the same way, just with different rates per BBL based on your actual estimated usage. In order to determine what to add to the BOM, someone with access to the overhead costs can relay this information to the production staff (if they don't already know this information, anyway) and non-inventory expenses such as utilities, rent, general maintenance, etc. can be added to the BOM as appropriate.
Why
...
Not Just List Actual Labor Hours Rather Than Per Barrel Costs for Labor?
Another option is to You have the option of making these non-inventory items as "manual" (rather than to automatically "backflush" per batch) and processing each line of the overhead/labor items the same way you would all other manual items (e.g. raw materials). If you attach your labor hours on each Bill of Material, then "manually issue" the labor for that brew, where you would then fill in the actual number of hours used (just like you would manually issue the # of pounds of malt, hops, etc.). This would accrue the specific cost per batch produced.
For some this might be feasible, for others it might be too difficult to truly capture the time spent on each batch. It's not uncommon to have one batch start before another is finished, so tracking this labor could be more difficult. Also, this requires manually collecting/documenting The method mentioned above, where labor is set as a standard cost and backflushed for each batch, requires no additional work whereas tracking actual labor hours requires the staff to track these hours and then someone to manually collect/document the number of hours in OBeer for each batch.
If tracking hours is not feasible in this manner, we suggest backflushing labor directly to the number of barrels produced.
...
Smaller breweries might track hours manually whereas most of our larger customers prefer the "per barrel" backflush method as described above. The backflush method is also how the world's largest breweries do it, as it is the only GAAP way to account for labor in a batch manufacturing businessthe tracking and documenting of hours becomes extremely difficult, if not impossible at times.
Do I need to use more that one non-inventory item to track additional costs in the production process?
How complex you decide to make the non-inventory item is up to each client. You could use one non-inventory overhead item for labor and another for all overhead if you want to keep it simple. If you want to build out more complexity/tracking abilities, you could create multiple labor and/or overhead non-inventory items and associate them respectively.
...